Executive Summary
Q1 2026 · All Channels · Los Angeles, CA · Projected
◈ PROJECTED DATA Q1 2026 figures are forward projections modeled from H2 2025 actuals (Jul–Dec 2025). Attribution framework built by Kriti Singhal, CRM Media Analyst, joined Jul 2025.
Total Revenue
$387K
↑ 22.4% vs Q4 2025
Total Ad Spend
$58.4K
↑ 8.1% vs Q4 2025
Blended ROAS
6.63×
↑ 1.2× vs Q4 2025
Attributed Orders
1,847
↑ 314 vs Q4 2025
Avg Order Value
$209
↑ $18 vs Q4 2025
Spend & Revenue by Channel
Google Ads
$24.8K
42%
Meta Ads
$17.2K
29%
Amazon Ads
$11.6K
20%
Organic/SEO
$4.8K
8%
Revenue by Channel (Data-Driven Attribution)
Google
$201.2K
6.6×
Meta
$115.8K
5.5×
Amazon
$58.1K
4.2×
Organic
$11.9K
⚡ Key Finding — Attribution Gap
Last-click attribution over-credits Google Ads by +$34.2K and under-credits Meta by -$28.7K. Meta operates heavily as a discovery/assist channel — 62% of Meta-touched conversions have Google as the final click. Reallocating based on data-driven model would increase Meta budget by ~$4K/mo and reduce Google Search by ~$3K/mo, projected to lift blended ROAS by 0.4×.
Weekly Performance — All Channels (Projected)
Jan–Mar 2026 · Projected Revenue, Spend, ROAS · Based on H2 2025 trajectory
Q1 2026 · Proj.
WeekGoogle RevMeta RevAmazon RevTotal RevTotal SpendBlended ROASOrders
Jan W1 2026$14,820$7,940$3,210$25,970$4,1406.27×122
Jan W2 2026$16,480$9,120$3,880$29,480$4,4906.56×139
Jan W3 2026$13,950$8,240$3,640$25,830$4,2206.12×118
Jan W4 2026$18,200$10,870$4,950$34,020$5,1806.57×162
Feb W1 2026$15,340$8,920$4,120$28,380$4,3806.48×131
Feb W2 2026$19,860$13,240$5,840$38,940$5,8406.67×182
Feb W3 2026$17,120$11,380$5,210$33,710$4,9206.85×158
Mar W1 2026$21,440$14,820$6,480$42,740$6,2806.80×201
Mar W2 2026$22,680$15,340$6,920$44,940$6,6206.79×212
Mar W3 2026$24,820$16,980$7,840$49,640$7,0807.01×231
G
Google Ads
Acct: 482-910-3847 · Baz Bros Vintage · Search + Shopping + PMax
Live
Spend
$24,840
Budget utilization 96%
Revenue
$201,240
↑ 19% vs H2 2025
ROAS
8.10×
Target: 6.0×
Clicks
18,472
CTR 3.84%
Impressions
481K
Avg Pos 2.1
Conv. Rate
4.21%
↑ 0.8pp vs H2 2025
CampaignTypeImpressionsClicksCTRCPCSpendConv.Conv. RateRevenueROAS
Vintage Denim — BrandSearch84,2104,8205.72%$0.84$4,0493186.60%$66,78016.5×
Vintage Outerwear — NBSearch112,4803,9403.50%$1.42$5,5951844.67%$38,6406.9×
Shopping — All ProductsShopping198,4006,2103.13%$1.18$7,3282013.24%$42,2105.8×
PMax — Vintage StreetwearPMax74,3202,8483.83%$2.06$5,8671284.49%$33,9205.8×
Remarketing — Cart AbandonDisplay11,5906545.64%$3.07$2,0016610.09%$19,6909.8×
Top Keywords — Search Campaigns
Q1 2026 · Proj.
KeywordMatch TypeImpressionsClicksCTRCPCConv.CPARevenue
vintage levi's jacketExact12,8401,0288.01%$0.7282$9.01$17,630
90s vintage clothing wholesalePhrase8,4206407.60%$1.1448$15.17$10,080
baz brothers vintageBroad5,28084215.9%$0.4871$5.70$14,910
vintage band tees bulkPhrase9,8405205.28%$1.8231$30.49$6,510
wholesale vintage denim LAExact4,1203187.72%$2.1424$28.36$5,040
vintage clothing supplierBroad14,2804202.94%$1.9418$45.44$3,780
📊 Google Ads Analysis
Brand search is delivering 16.5× ROAS — well above targets, suggesting brand awareness built by Meta upper-funnel is converting efficiently here. The remarketing campaign (cart abandonment) shows 10.09% CVR, the highest across all campaigns, pointing to a strong mid-funnel gap that Meta Ads and email could plug before relying on paid remarketing. Non-brand search keywords like "vintage clothing supplier" show a $45 CPA vs $9 for brand terms — consider shifting budget to Shopping where CPCs are lower and intent is comparable.
M
Meta Ads
Acct: act_1892047360 · Baz Bros Vintage · FB + IG + Reels + Stories
Live
Spend
$17,240
Budget util. 89%
Revenue (MTA)
$115,820
LC: $87,140
ROAS (7d click)
5.53×
LC ROAS: 4.17×
Reach
284K
Freq. 3.2
Link Clicks
9,840
CTR 3.46%
CPM
$60.70
↑ $4.2 QoQ
CampaignObjectiveReachImpressionsCTRCPMSpendPurchasesCPAROASAssist CVR
Vintage Haul — TOF ProspectingSales98,420314,9443.84%$58.40$5,830148$39.395.2×62%
Lookalike 1% — LTV ChampionsSales54,180173,3764.12%$54.20$3,410102$33.436.8×41%
IG Reels — Streetwear CreativeAwareness74,280237,6962.18%$62.80$4,98068$73.242.9×81%
Retargeting — Site Visitors 14dSales18,94060,6085.20%$68.40$2,02084$24.058.4×28%
Winback — Lapsed 90dSales12,48039,9364.48%$63.10$1,00038$26.327.2×24%
Creative Performance — Top Ads
Q1 2026 · Proj.
Ad NameFormatSpendImpressionsCTRHook RateHold RatePurchasesROAS
Warehouse Walk — Jan 2026 Haul UGCReels$2,84094,6674.82%38%61%747.8×
90s Denim Wall StaticImage$1,94064,6673.60%526.1×
Thrift Haul GRWM CarouselCarousel$2,12070,6674.20%616.8×
Vintage Flannels Try-OnReels$1,48049,3332.84%22%38%243.2×
Price Drop — Bulk BuyersStory$86028,6675.14%318.4×
📊 Meta Ads Analysis
The 1% LTV Lookalike delivers a 6.8× ROAS — the strongest paid prospecting ROAS on platform — validating that seeding lookalike audiences from your RFM Champion segment dramatically improves targeting efficiency. The IG Reels Awareness campaign shows a low direct ROAS (2.9×) but an 81% assist conversion rate — meaning 81% of its attributed conversions were later completed through Google or retargeting. This is a classic assist channel being penalized by last-click. Under data-driven attribution, this campaign's contribution nearly doubles. The "Vintage Haul UGC" format outperforms every static creative on CTR and ROAS — a signal to invest more in creator-shot, walk-through-the-warehouse content.
A
Amazon Ads
Store: BazBrosVintage · Seller Central · Sponsored Products + Brands + Display
Live
Spend
$11,640
Budget util. 82%
Revenue
$58,100
↓ 4% MoM
ACOS
20.0%
Target: 18%
TACOS
14.2%
Organic lift
Click-Throughs
6,284
CTR 0.48%
Units Sold
412
Avg: $141 ASP
CampaignTypeImpressionsClicksCTRCPCSpendSalesACOSUnits
Vintage Denim — AutoSP Auto482,8402,1080.44%$0.88$1,855$18,24010.2%128
Vintage Outerwear — ManualSP Manual318,4201,8400.58%$1.24$2,282$16,48013.8%114
Brand Awareness — Sponsored BrandsSB284,1101,4080.50%$1.84$2,591$12,84020.2%88
Retarget — Product PagesSD148,2406400.43%$2.48$1,587$6,24025.4%42
Vintage Graphic Tees — AutoSP Auto98,8402880.29%$1.12$323$4,3007.5%40
Top ASINs by Ad Performance
Q1 2026 · Proj.
ASINProductImpressionsClicksSalesACOSOrganic RankBSR
B09X4KL28MLevi's 501 Deadstock Denim Bundle148,420824$12,4808.4%Pg 1, #3#284
B0A2MN91PQY2K Vintage Outerwear Mixed Box94,280540$9,72012.1%Pg 1, #7#512
B08QWR47TCVintage Band Tees 10-Pack76,840420$7,14015.8%Pg 2, #2#1,024
B0C8VPX2WLVintage Flannel Shirts Assorted48,420280$4,48022.4%Pg 2, #8#2,140
⚠️ Amazon Attribution Gap
Amazon's Sponsored Display retargeting shows a 25.4% ACOS — above the 18% target. However, TACOS (total ACOS including organic sales) is 14.2%, meaning ad spend is driving organic rank improvements that partially justify the higher ACOS. Recommendation: reduce SD bids by 15% and reinvest in Sponsored Products for the top 2 ASINs, where ACOS is sub-13%. Amazon traffic rarely overlaps with Google/Meta path data — treat Amazon as a parallel conversion channel, not an assist, when building cross-channel attribution.
G4
Google Analytics 4
Property: 384-920-4710 · bazbrosvintage.com · Enhanced Ecommerce
Realtime: 14 active
Sessions
84,210
↑ 18% vs H2 2025
Users
61,480
↑ 21% vs H2 2025
Engagement Rate
61.4%
↑ 4.1pp vs H2 2025
Conversions
1,847
CVR 2.19%
Revenue
$329K
vs $387K paid
Avg Session
3m 42s
↑ 28s QoQ
Traffic by Channel Group
GA4 Default
ChannelSessionsEng. RateRevenueCVR
Paid Search28,42058.2%$148,2403.84%
Paid Social18,84054.8%$78,4202.84%
Organic Search14,28072.4%$41,8402.14%
Email8,42078.4%$38,4804.21%
Direct9,84062.4%$14,8401.12%
Referral4,41064.2%$7,1601.48%
Funnel — Purchase Journey
Enhanced Ecomm
Session start
84,210
Product view
60,631 (72%)
Add to cart
32,000 (53%)
Begin checkout
16,842 (53%)
Payment info
11,789 (70%)
Purchase
7,588 (64%)
Landing Page Performance
Paid Traffic Only
Landing PageSessionsBounce RateAvg TimeAdd-to-CartRevenueCVR
/collections/vintage-denim12,84028.4%4m 12s42.1%$58,2403.84%
/products/levis-501-bundle8,42022.1%5m 38s51.2%$48,1804.92%
/collections/outerwear7,84034.8%3m 22s34.8%$31,2602.84%
/pages/wholesale4,28042.1%2m 48s18.4%$12,8401.84%
/14,82051.2%1m 52s12.4%$18,4201.12%
📊 GA4 Analysis — Revenue Discrepancy
GA4 reports $329K in revenue vs $387K across platform-reported numbers — a $58K discrepancy. This is expected: (1) Meta's 7-day view-through window claims conversions that occur outside a session (no GA4 event fired), (2) Amazon transactions don't pass back to GA4, (3) iOS 14.5+ limits Meta pixel tracking for ~38% of iOS traffic. The GA4 number is the most conservative (click-based) attribution. The email channel is the highest CVR channel at 4.21% despite receiving zero paid spend — indicating a high-intent audience that should be grown through list acquisition campaigns. The homepage has a 51% bounce rate from paid traffic — a landing page optimization priority.
Last Click
First Click
Linear
Time Decay
Data-Driven
Revenue attribution by model — all channels
Full Attribution Comparison Table
All 5 Models
ChannelLast ClickFirst ClickLinearTime DecayData-DrivenΔ LC→DD
Google Paid Search $148,240$92,840$118,420$138,480$114,060 −$34,180
Meta Ads $87,140$142,840$114,280$94,820$115,820 +$28,680
Amazon Ads $58,100$54,280$56,840$57,480$58,100 ±$0
Organic Search $24,840$42,840$32,840$28,480$38,480 +$13,640
Email / CRM $38,480$12,840$28,420$36,240$28,840 −$9,640
Direct $14,840$24,840$16,840$12,840$11,940 −$2,900
Channel assist overlap — % of conversions where channel appeared in path
GoogleMetaAmazonOrganicEmail
Google
100%
62%
18%
44%
31%
Meta
58%
100%
12%
28%
42%
Amazon
8%
7%
100%
6%
9%
Read as: "X% of Google conversions also had a Meta touchpoint in the path." Amazon operates almost entirely in isolation.
⚡ Attribution Model Recommendation
The data-driven model is the recommended attribution standard for Baz Bros. Key rationale: (1) Meta's influence is structurally undervalued by last-click — 62% of Google conversions passed through a Meta touchpoint first, (2) Amazon is a closed ecosystem and should be measured independently with TACOS, not cross-channel attribution, (3) Direct traffic at 14.8K sessions likely contains misattributed paid social (iOS traffic with no click ID). Implementing UTM enforcement on all paid links + GA4 data-driven attribution will reduce reported ROAS for Google by ~18% while more accurately reflecting Meta's role in the funnel. Budget reallocation should follow.
Top Conversion Paths — Q1 2025
Ordered by path revenue contribution · Multi-touch · 847 paths analyzed
30-day window
#Conversion PathConversionsRevenueAvg Path LengthAvg Days
1
Meta Reels Google Brand Direct
284$61,4803.04.2d
2
Google NB Search Google Brand
218$48,2402.01.8d
3
Meta Prospecting Meta Retarget Google Shopping
162$34,0203.07.4d
4
Organic Search Google Brand
148$31,0802.02.1d
5
Meta Awareness Organic Email Google Brand
94$21,6204.012.8d
6
Google Shopping
204$20,1961.00d
7
Email (Welcome) Google Brand
112$18,4802.03.4d
⚡ Path Analysis — Key Takeaways
Path #1 is the dominant pattern: Meta discovers → Google Brand converts. This explains why last-click over-credits Google. Path #3 reveals a 7.4-day consideration cycle for customers who need two Meta exposures before converting via Shopping — a strong case for extending the Meta retargeting window from 7 to 14 days. Path #5 shows the longest consideration cycle (12.8 days, 4 touchpoints) but represents your highest-complexity buyer — likely a wholesale buyer evaluating multiple suppliers. Email functions as a critical mid-path nurture signal in this segment.
ℹ️ Analyst Context — Methodology Note
This attribution framework was designed and built by Kriti Singhal (CRM Media Analyst, joined Baz Bros July 2025). Q1 2026 figures are forward projections modeled from H2 2025 actuals using channel-level growth rates, seasonal indices from prior years, and spend trajectory confirmed with the paid media team in Dec 2025. The attribution model logic, channel overlap matrix, and path analysis methodology reflect infrastructure put in place between Jul–Dec 2025.
🎯 Strategic Finding 1 — The Attribution Gap Is Costing Budget Efficiency
Under last-click attribution, Google Ads appears to deliver $148K of $387K projected revenue (38%). Under data-driven attribution, that drops to $114K (29%) — a $34K overstatement. This pattern was identified in H2 2025 actuals and is projected to persist into Q1 2026 without intervention. The fix: implement GA4 data-driven attribution as the reporting standard, enforce UTM parameters on all paid creative, and reduce Google Brand bid caps by 15-20% to test demand elasticity without incremental Meta investment.
⚠️ Strategic Finding 2 — iOS Attribution Blind Spot
Approximately 38% of Meta's iOS traffic generates no GA4 session because ATT opt-outs prevent pixel firing. This means $44K of Meta-attributed revenue has no corresponding GA4 session — inflating the "Direct" channel and making Meta look less efficient than it is in GA4 reports. Mitigation: implement Meta CAPI (Conversions API) server-side tracking, which bypasses the browser pixel and is unaffected by ATT. Estimated recovery: +12-18% of previously untracked Meta conversions.
🎯 Strategic Finding 3 — Amazon Is a Parallel Ecosystem, Not an Assist Channel
Channel overlap analysis confirms Amazon touchpoints appear in only 8-12% of cross-channel conversion paths — Amazon buyers rarely engage with Google or Meta ads in the same path. Amazon should be treated as a separate P&L with TACOS (14.2%) as the primary efficiency metric, not included in blended ROAS calculations. This also means Amazon ad budget decisions should not be made in reference to Google/Meta performance — they serve distinct buyer behaviors (convenience + price comparison vs brand discovery).
🎯 Strategic Finding 4 — Email Is Underinvested and Outperforming
Email delivers a 4.21% CVR — the highest of any channel — and appears as a mid-path assist in 12.8-day consideration paths. It receives zero paid acquisition spend yet contributes $28-38K in attributed revenue depending on the model. Baz Bros should invest in list growth: a Meta Lead Gen campaign targeting vintage fashion buyers at a $5 CPL would generate ~1,000 new subscribers/month at $5K spend, with estimated 6-month email LTV of $48+ per subscriber based on current email CVR and AOV.
🔴 Strategic Finding 5 — Homepage Paid Landing Has 51% Bounce Rate
Paid traffic landing on bazbrosvintage.com/ (home page) has a 51.2% bounce rate vs 22-28% for product-specific landing pages. This is burning an estimated $4,200/quarter in wasted ad spend (based on average CPC × bounced sessions). Immediate fix: ensure all paid campaigns deep-link to collection or product pages. All PMax campaigns should use custom URLs with UTM parameters. All Meta ads should send to the collection page matching the creative's product category — not the home page.
Prioritized Action Plan
Ranked by Impact
#ActionOwnerEst. ImpactEffortTimeline
P0Enforce UTM parameters on all paid campaignsKriti + Paid teamAttribution accuracy ↑Low1 week
P0Switch reporting to GA4 data-driven attributionKritiTrue ROAS visibilityLow1 week
P1Deep-link all paid ads to product/collection pagesPaid + Creative+$4.2K saved/qtrLow2 weeks
P1Implement Meta CAPI server-side trackingDev + Kriti+12-18% tracked convsMedium3 weeks
P1Extend Meta retargeting window 7d → 14dPaid SocialPath #3 ROAS ↑Low1 week
P2Launch Meta Lead Gen campaign for email list growthKriti + Creative$48 LTV/subscriberMedium4 weeks
P2Reduce Google Brand bid caps 15-20%SEM ManagerReallocate $3K/moLow2 weeks
P3Separate Amazon TACOS reporting from blended ROASKritiBudget clarityLow1 week